BREAKING: Amid battle with Akpabio, Natasha storms court to challenge 6-month suspension from senate

• Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan challenged her suspension successful court, accusing the Senate of bias and unfair treatment
• Furthermore, the ineligible teams debated whether her satirical apology station violated tribunal orders
• Akpoti-Uduaghan defended her close to escaped speech, claiming the missive was not a breach of tribunal orders

FCT, Abuja - Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan made a melodramatic quality earlier the Federal High Court successful Abuja connected Tuesday, May 13, to situation her suspension from the Senate.

The legislator is contesting the allegations of misconduct which led to her suspension, asserting that the actions taken against her were unfair and biased.

Natasha Storms Court To Challenge Her Suspension As Senator
Source: Twitter

The lawsuit revolves astir the question filed by Akpoti-Uduaghan, wherever she joined respective parties, including the National Assembly, the Senate, Senate President Godswill Akpabio, and Senator Neda Imasuem, the Chairman of the Senate Committee connected Ethics, Privileges, and Code of Conduct, arsenic defendants.

Motion for the suspension and ineligible proceedings

At the commencement of the hearing, the case, which had been reassigned to Justice Binta Nyako aft Justice Obiorah Egwuatu withdrew from the matter, was brought earlier the court.

The ineligible squad representing Akpoti-Uduaghan, led by Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Jibrin Okutekpa, informed the tribunal that each indispensable documents had been filed successful accordance with the court's erstwhile directive. This acceptable the signifier for the ineligible conflict ahead.

Counsel representing the Senate, Paul Daudu (SAN), and Senate President Ekwo Ejembi, besides confirmed that they had filed their documents.

However, they drew the court's attraction to a question regarding alleged disobedience to the court’s bid connected the portion of the plaintiff, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan.

Allegations of disobedience to tribunal orders

The elder lawyers representing the 2nd and 3rd defendants successful the suit, the Senate and Senate President, accused Akpoti-Uduaghan of contempt of court.

They referred to a Facebook station and a missive published successful immoderate nationalist newspapers connected March 27, 2025, wherever the suspended legislator issued a satirical apology to the Senate President.

The defence counsel argued that this was successful nonstop usurpation of the court’s order, which prohibited nationalist commentary connected the substance earlier the court.

Counsel for Akpoti-Uduaghan, Michael Numan (SAN), denied these allegations, confirming the receipt of the question and countering the claim.

He reiterated that the Facebook post, which was credited to the senator, had nary transportation to her and did not breach immoderate tribunal order.

Numan stressed that the missive was not intended to defy the court's authorization and should not beryllium considered a contemptuous statement.

Akpoti-Uduaghan defends her actions

Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan, successful her counter-affidavit, powerfully defended her close to escaped speech.

She accused the Senate President of trying to suppress her law close to explicit herself freely. She clarified that the letter, which has garnered important attention, was centred connected the intersexual harassment allegations against Akpabio, alternatively than the suspension substance presently earlier the court.

The suspended legislator further stated that her actions, including the satirical letter, were successful nary mode a breach of the tribunal bid which prohibits nationalist statements by parties progressive successful the case.

According to her, the substance earlier the tribunal should absorption connected her suspension and the legitimacy of that decision, alternatively than the contented of her viral letter.

The ineligible proceedings continue

The ineligible conflict betwixt Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Senate is acold from over. With accusations of contempt and allegations of bias successful the suspension process, the Federal High Court successful Abuja is expected to play a important relation successful determining whether Akpoti-Uduaghan's suspension was lawful and whether her actions, including her arguable letter, were successful breach of tribunal orders.

The lawsuit is acceptable to continue, and some parties await the court's determination connected these contentious issues.

The result could person lasting implications for the senator's governmental aboriginal and the broader governmental landscape.

Natasha vs Akpabio: Akpabio drags Kogi lawmaker to tribunal

Previously, Legit.ng reported that Senate President Godswill Akpabio asked a national precocious tribunal successful Abuja to compel Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, the suspended lawmaker representing Kogi Central district, to delete the satirical apology she posted connected her societal media platforms.

Akpabio’s petition is contained successful a question arsenic portion of an ongoing suit initiated by the suspended legislator to contention her suspension from the Senate.

PAY ATTENTION: Сheck retired quality that is picked exactly for YOU ➡️ find the “Recommended for you” artifact connected the location leafage and enjoy!

Source: Legit.ng