- PDP governors person filed a suit astatine the Supreme Court against President Bola Tinubu and the National Assembly
- The 7 governors prayed the apex tribunal to state President Tinubu's authorities of exigency declaration and suspension of Governor Sim Fubara arsenic gross usurpation of the Constitution
- The governors argued that President Tinubu has nary powers to suspend a democratically elected governor, lawman and lawmakers
Legit.ng writer Adekunle Dada has implicit 7 years of acquisition covering metro, authorities policy, and planetary events
Port Harcourt, Rivers authorities - Governors elected nether the level of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) person dragged President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the National Assembly earlier the Supreme Court implicit suspension of Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara.
Legit.ng recalls that Presidnet Tinubu suspended Fubara, his lawman Ngozi Odu, and the Rivers House of Assembly members for six months.

Source: Facebook
As reported by The Punch, the 7 PDP governors of Bauchi, Adamawa, Bayelsa, Enugu, Osun, Plateau, and Zamfara states challenged Tinubu’s powerfulness to suspend an elected governors Legit.ng writer Adekunle Dada has implicit 7 years of acquisition covering metro, authorities policy, and planetary events and lawmakers.
The PDP governors done their Attorney-Generals described the suspension arsenic unconstitutional.
They urged the Supreme Court to state that “the suspension of Governor Siminalaye Fubara, his deputy, and members of the Rivers State House of Assembly was unconstitutional, unlawful, and successful gross usurpation of the provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).”
“The President has nary powers whatsoever oregon authorization to suspend a democratically elected politician and lawman politician of a authorities successful the Federation of Nigeria nether the guise of oregon pursuant to the proclamation of a authorities of exigency successful immoderate authorities of the federation, including the states represented by the plaintiffs,” based connected the provisions of Sections 1(2), 5(2), and 305 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).The aggrieved governors argued that Tinubu’s declaration of a authorities of exigency successful Rivers State did not comply with the law requirements acceptable retired successful Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
The governors besides urged the apex tribunal to nullify the assignment of the sole head appointed to govern the state.
They challenged the constitutionality of the dependable votes utilized by the National Assembly to ratify Tinubu’s declaration of a authorities of exigency and suspension successful Rivers state.
Legit.ng earlier reported that President Tinubu was dragged to tribunal implicit the assignment of Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas (rtd) arsenic the sole head of Rivers state.
A ineligible practitioner, Johnmary Jideobi, asked the Federal High Court sitting successful Abuja to sack Rivers' sole administrator.
Jideobi argued that the assignment of a sole head successful Rivers authorities is unconstitutional, null and void, and of nary ineligible effect whatsoever.
Rivers sole head orders LG heads to taxable assembly reports
Meanwhile, Legit.ng reported that Ibas issued caller bid to the 23 Heads of section authorities administration successful Rivers state.
Ibas ordered the 23 HLGA to taxable the activities of their respective councils connected oregon earlier Wednesday, March 26, 2025.
According to the letter, the LG heads are to taxable sources of gross of the LGAs, the fig of unit connected a nominal roll, functions of councils etc.
PAY ATTENTION: Сheck retired quality that is picked exactly for YOU ➡️ find the “Recommended for you” artifact connected the location leafage and enjoy!
Source: Legit.ng